Publicidade
Publicidade

Questão 56415

UFRGS 2018
Inglês

(UFRGS - 2018)

TEXTO PARA A PRÓXIMA QUESTÃO:

A(s) questão(ões) a seguir está(ão) relacionada(s) ao texto abaixo.

_____1_____ September 11, 2001, at 8:46 A.M., a hijacked airliner crashed into the north tower of the World Trade Center in New York. At 9:03 A.M. a second plane crashed into the south tower. The resulting infernos caused the buildings to collapse, 1the south tower after burning for an hour and two minutes, the north tower twenty-three minutes after that. 2The attacks were masterminded by Osama bin Laden in an attempt to intimidate the United States and unite Muslims for a restoration of the caliphate.

9/11, as the happenings of that day are now called, has set off debates on a vast array of topics. But I would like to explore a lesserknown debate triggered by it. Exactly how many events took place in New York on that morning _____2_____ September?

3It could be argued that the answer is one. The attacks on the two buildings were part of a single plan conceived by one man in service of a single agenda. They unfolded _____3_____ a few minutes and yards of each other, targeting the parts of a complex with a single name, design, and owner. And they launched a single chain of military and political events in their aftermath.

Or it could be argued that the answer is two. The towers were distinct collections of glass and steel separated by an expanse of space, and they were hit at different times and went out of existence at different times. The amateur video that showed the second plane 4closing in on the south tower as the north tower billowed with smoke makes the twoness unmistakable: while one event was frozen in the past, the other loomed in the future.

The gravity of 9/11 would seem to make this discussion frivolous to the point of impudence, a matter of mere "semantics," as we say, with its implication of 5splitting hairs. But the relation of language to our inner and outer worlds is a matter of intellectual fascination and real-world importance.

_____4_____ "importance" is often hard to quantify, _____5_____ this case I can put an exact value on it: 3,5 billion dollars. That was the sum in a legal dispute for the insurance payout to Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the World Trade Center site. Silverstein’s insurance policies stipulated a maximum reimbursement for each destructive "event." If 9/11 comprised a single event, he stood to receive 3,5 billion dollars; if two, he stood to receive 7 billion. In the trials, the attorneys disputed the applicable meaning of the term event. The lawyers for the leaseholder defined it in physical terms (two collapses); those for the insurance companies defined it in mental terms (one plot). There is nothing "mere" about semantics!

Adapted from: PINKER, Steven. The Stuff of Thought. New York: Penguin, 2007. p. 1-2.

 

Consider the following propostitions for rephrasing the fragment of the sentence the south tower after burning for an hour and two minutes (ref. 1)

I. the south tower lower after having been burning for an hour and two minutes

II. the south tower after it ws burning for an hour and two minutes

III. the south tower after it had been burning for an hour and two minutes

 

If applied to the text, which ones would be correct and keep the literal meaning?

A

Only I

B

Only II

C

Only I and III

D

Only II and III

E

I, II and III

Gabarito:

Only I and III



Resolução:

Tradução do trecho "a torre sul depois de queimar por uma hora e dois minutos"

I. Correta, já que o present perfect continuous que é utilizado nessa frase é utilizado ao falar de ações que começaram no passado e estão acontecendo ainda no presente, no caso, o incêndio da torre começou no passado e ainda está ocorrendo no presente, sendo correto o uso deste tempo verbal.

II. Incorreta, já que o past continuous, utilizado nessa frase denota situações que aconteciam no passado, mas que já foram interrompidas no presente, não sendo mantido o sentido original da frase do enunciado.

III. Correta, pois o past perfect continuous, tempo em que foi conjugado o verbo, pode ser usado para expressar ações que começaram no passado antes de outra ação que também começou no passado, e que ainda não foi interrompida, sendo possível utiliza-lo sem alteração no sentido.

Questões relacionadas

Questão 43713

(Ufrgs 2018)  The complex linguistic universe of Game of Thrones   Game of Thrones has 1garnered 38 Emmy awards for its portrayal of a world of sex, violence and politics so real that som...
Ver questão

Questão 56281

(UFRGS - 2018) TEXTO PARA A PRÓXIMA QUESTÃO: A(s) questão(ões) a seguir está(ão) relacionada(s) ao texto abaixo. _____1_____ September 11, 2001, at 8:46 A....
Ver questão

Questão 58799

(UFRGS - 2018) TEXTO PARA A PRÓXIMA QUESTÃO: A(s) questão(ões) a seguir está(ão) relacionada(s) ao texto abaixo.   So here I am, upside down in a wom...
Ver questão

Questão 61121

(UFRGS - 2018) TEXTO PARA A PRÓXIMA QUESTÃO: A(s) questão(ões) a seguir está(ão) relacionada(s) ao texto abaixo. _____1_____ September 11, 2001, at 8:...
Ver questão
Publicidade